David Graeber, one of the founders of the Occupy movement, writes that Occupy is diverging from liberalism to become a revolutionary movement.
Occupy is shedding its liberal accretions and rapidly turning into something with much deeper roots, creating alliances that promise to transform the very notion of revolutionary politics in America.
I certainly identify with the liberal rather than radical tendencies that he is saying goodbye to. And although Occupy does not have any formal leaders, he is one of its most prominent informal leaders, and likely anticipates its future direction correctly.
I want no part of a revolutionary movement. As problematic as things are in this country, the idea that “nothing could be worse” is bunk. The history of the bloody 20th century shows that revolutionary movements often commit mass murder.
I don’t believe in tearing down the house you live in. If you look at history, evolution, not revolution, has the best track record. I would find Graeber’s vision of the future scary if I thought he had a chance of succeeding. Throughout history, however, anarchism has always been self-defeating, and I expect it will remain that way.
Occupy has it’s moment, and it looks to me like that moment is passing away, as it turns it’s back on liberal accretions and other, even more conservative elements of the 99% to focus on a radical fringe.
I will continue to honor my pledge to give all earnings from my book through the end of this year to the Occupy movement. But I probably won’t be participating anymore (not just because of Graeber himself, but because I think he does indeed reflect where Occupy is headed).
My advocacy for a more mindful economics will have to find other outlets, for instance at the upcoming conference of the New Economics Institute, and in the promotion of a more equitable, caring and lower growth economy that has a chance of being sustainable.
